Table 2.
Model performance statistics for RF1–RF12. Best performing models (RF1, RF2) are highlighted (italic script)
| MAE (mean) | MAE (std) | MSE (mean) | MSE (std) | RMSE (mean) | RMSE (std) | R2 (mean) | R2 (std) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF1 | 10.808 | 0.585 | 166.555 | 25.013 | 12.866 | 1.012 | 0.527 | 0.119 |
| RF2 | 10.870 | 1.039 | 165.676 | 29.540 | 12.816 | 1.196 | 0.541 | 0.070 |
| RF3 | 11.563 | 0.278 | 183.741 | 16.780 | 13.542 | 0.607 | 0.472 | 0.134 |
| RF4 | 10.746 | 0.831 | 169.299 | 26.649 | 12.973 | 1.006 | 0.523 | 0.097 |
| RF5 | 11.563 | 0.278 | 183.741 | 16.780 | 13.542 | 0.607 | 0.472 | 0.134 |
| RF6 | 10.746 | 0.831 | 169.299 | 26.649 | 12.973 | 1.006 | 0.523 | 0.097 |
| RF7 | 11.662 | 1.023 | 180.817 | 30.135 | 13.400 | 1.120 | 0.473 | 0.185 |
| RF8 | 11.489 | 1.108 | 176.699 | 31.525 | 13.236 | 1.226 | 0.475 | 0.196 |
| RF9 | 10.810 | 1.423 | 190.745 | 44.110 | 13.717 | 1.605 | 0.470 | 0.122 |
| RF10 | 11.655 | 1.043 | 180.520 | 30.410 | 13.388 | 1.131 | 0.473 | 0.186 |
| RF11 | 11.489 | 1.108 | 176.699 | 31.525 | 13.236 | 1.226 | 0.475 | 0.196 |
| RF12 | 11.347 | 1.038 | 172.776 | 31.121 | 13.087 | 1.228 | 0.490 | 0.180 |