Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 6;39(4):3054–3067. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01714-0

Table 2.

Model performance statistics for RF1–RF12. Best performing models (RF1, RF2) are highlighted (italic script)

MAE (mean) MAE (std) MSE (mean) MSE (std) RMSE (mean) RMSE (std) R2 (mean) R2 (std)
RF1 10.808 0.585 166.555 25.013 12.866 1.012 0.527 0.119
RF2 10.870 1.039 165.676 29.540 12.816 1.196 0.541 0.070
RF3 11.563 0.278 183.741 16.780 13.542 0.607 0.472 0.134
RF4 10.746 0.831 169.299 26.649 12.973 1.006 0.523 0.097
RF5 11.563 0.278 183.741 16.780 13.542 0.607 0.472 0.134
RF6 10.746 0.831 169.299 26.649 12.973 1.006 0.523 0.097
RF7 11.662 1.023 180.817 30.135 13.400 1.120 0.473 0.185
RF8 11.489 1.108 176.699 31.525 13.236 1.226 0.475 0.196
RF9 10.810 1.423 190.745 44.110 13.717 1.605 0.470 0.122
RF10 11.655 1.043 180.520 30.410 13.388 1.131 0.473 0.186
RF11 11.489 1.108 176.699 31.525 13.236 1.226 0.475 0.196
RF12 11.347 1.038 172.776 31.121 13.087 1.228 0.490 0.180