TABLE 1.
Changes in pathogen titers in citrus veins following HIF treatment.
| Sample number | Before processing | After processing 20 times | The pathogen titer decreased (%) |
After processing 25 times | The pathogen titer decreased (%) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT value ± SD | Average copy number/vein tissue* |
CT value ± SD | Average copy number/vein tissue |
CT value ± SD | Average copy number/vein tissue |
|||
| HIF treatment | ||||||||
| 1 | 25.19 ± 0.03 | 7234.99 | 27.03 ± 0.06 | 1963.38 | The pathogen titer decreased 52.61% |
29.00 ± 0.03 | 485.91 | The pathogen titer decreased 61.85% |
| 2 | 25.07 ± 0.04 | 7877.34 | 29.03 ± 0.04 | 475.68 | 28.34 ± 0.04 | 775.77 | ||
| 3 | 26.20 ± 003 | 3536.03 | 26.30 ± 0.03 | 3294.06 | 27.04 ± 0.03 | 1949.52 | ||
| 4 | 26.05 ± 0.21 | 4149.78 | 26.69 ± 0.01 | 2498.46 | 27.60 ± 0.03 | 1310.79 | ||
| 5 | 25.96 ± 0.01 | 4899.19 | 25.92 ± 0.04 | 4312.33 | 25.91 ± 0.04 | 4343.01 | ||
| 6 | 25.74 ± 0.02 | 3932.72 | 26.72 ± 0.04 | 2445.89 | 26.34 ± 0.03 | 3201.97 | ||
| Average | 5271.68 ± 1693.57a | 2498.30 ± 1399.16b | 2011.16 ± 1511.21b | |||||
| Control | ||||||||
| CK1 | 24.93 ± 0.01 | 8699.17 | 26.73 ± 0.02 | 2428.62 | The pathogen titer increased 9.03% |
24.88 ± 0.04 | 9013.01 | The pathogen titer decreased 18.69% |
| CK2 | 24.66 ± 0.03 | 10534.06 | 26.32 ± 0.00 | 3247.69 | 25.02 ± 0.01 | 8161.53 | ||
| CK3 | 28.46 ± 0.01 | 712.51 | 26.15 ± 0.05 | 3663.60 | 25.69 ± 0.01 | 5075.94 | ||
| CK4 | 25.10 ± 0.01 | 7711.60 | 25.08 ± 0.00 | 7821.70 | 25.82 ± 0.01 | 4629.10 | ||
| CK5 | 25.54 ± 0.03 | 5645.38 | 24.22 ± 0.03 | 14389.54 | 26.43 ± 0.01 | 3004.08 | ||
| CK6 | 25.63 ± 0.02 | 5296.48 | 24.66 ± 0.03 | 10534.06 | 27.41 ± 0.02 | 1499.77 | ||
| Average | 6433.19a | 7014.20a | 5230.57a | |||||
*According to the standard curve Y = −3.2484X + 37.727, CT values were converted to Copy number/Leaf vein tissue. The “different letters” provided in this table denotes the differences between groups reached a significant level (P < 0.05).