Table 3.
ICC analysis of the two evaluators.
| Values | Evaluator A ICC | Evaluator B ICC | ICC between A and B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal intensity (psoas major muscles) | 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.92) | 0.8 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.96) | 0.82 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.92) |
| Signal intensity (multifidus muscles) | 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.98) | 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.94) | 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.89) |
| Signal intensity (erector spinae muscles) | 0.81 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.16) | 0.84 | 0.82 |
| Volume (psoas major muscles) | 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.96) | 0.82 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.92) | 0.8 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.95) |
| Volume (multifidus muscles) | 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.92) | 0.8 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.94) | 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.85) |
| Volume (erector spinae muscles) | 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.92) | 0.76 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.86) | 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.86) |
| Cobb angle | 0.78 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.96) | 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.85) | 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.89) |
| Maximum vertebral inclination angle | 0.75 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.86) | 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.89) | 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.87) |
| Flexibility index | 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.87) | 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.92) | 0.8 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.92) |
| Fat fraction | 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.91) | 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.95) | 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.92) |
| Maximum thickness of erector spinae muscles | 0.8 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.91) | 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89) | 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.87) |
ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval.