Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 12;18:364. doi: 10.1186/s13102-026-01792-9

Table 13.

Ablation Experiment Results (mean ± SD over ten random seeds; paired t-tests against the complete model with Bonferroni correction for six comparisons)

Configuration Accuracy (%) F1 Score AUC Δ (pp) t(9) p (Bonferroni) Cohen’s d
Complete Model 91.3 ± 0.4 0.908 ± 0.005 0.952 ± 0.003 — — — —
w/o Cross-modal Attention 83.5 ± 0.7 0.826 ± 0.009 0.891 ± 0.006 −7.8 23.4 < 1 × 10⁻⁸ 6.2
w/o Spatiotemporal Alignment 85.7 ± 0.5 0.847 ± 0.007 0.908 ± 0.005 −5.6 16.8 2.1 × 10⁻⁷ 4.8
w/o Gated Fusion 87.2 ± 0.5 0.864 ± 0.006 0.921 ± 0.004 −4.1 12.5 3.2 × 10⁻⁶ 3.7
w/o Data Augmentation 88.1 ± 0.5 0.873 ± 0.006 0.928 ± 0.004 −3.2 9.6 2.9 × 10⁻⁵ 2.9
IMU Only 82.7 ± 0.6 0.814 ± 0.008 0.879 ± 0.006 −8.6 25.7 < 1 × 10⁻⁸ 6.8
Scale Only 79.4 ± 0.8 0.782 ± 0.010 0.856 ± 0.007 −11.9 30.2 < 1 × 10⁻⁹ 7.5