Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 5;59:48. doi: 10.1186/s40659-026-00710-0

Table 3.

ANOVA for biometric and resistance traits of the F5 population shows the significant variation in the treatment

Source df Mean. Sq
DFF PH PL NPT SPY TGW
Treatment (ignoring Blocks) 57 287.16** 585.59** 11.47** 47.76** 142.46** 16.83**
Treatment: Check 6 536.26** 829.78** 58.70** 183.05** 301.23** 78.15**
Treatment: Test 50 146.62** 305.26** 4.34* 32.47** 113.47** 6.94**
Treatment: Test vs. Check 1 5819.51** 13,137.21** 84.13** 0.75 ns 639.71** 143.04**
Block (eliminating Treatments) 4 0.74 ns 1.53 ns 1.33 ns 0.43 ns 10.44 ns 0.50 ns
Residuals 24 2.29 18.66 1.86 2.76 28.44 0.37

ⁿˢP  > 0.05; *P  <  = 0.05; **P  <  = 0.01

df Degrees of freedom, DFF Days to 50% flowering, PH Plant Height, PL Panicle Length, NPT Number of Productive Tillers, SPY Single Plant Yield, TGW 1000 grain weight