Table 3.
ANOVA for biometric and resistance traits of the F5 population shows the significant variation in the treatment
| Source | df | Mean. Sq | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFF | PH | PL | NPT | SPY | TGW | ||
| Treatment (ignoring Blocks) | 57 | 287.16** | 585.59** | 11.47** | 47.76** | 142.46** | 16.83** |
| Treatment: Check | 6 | 536.26** | 829.78** | 58.70** | 183.05** | 301.23** | 78.15** |
| Treatment: Test | 50 | 146.62** | 305.26** | 4.34* | 32.47** | 113.47** | 6.94** |
| Treatment: Test vs. Check | 1 | 5819.51** | 13,137.21** | 84.13** | 0.75 ns | 639.71** | 143.04** |
| Block (eliminating Treatments) | 4 | 0.74 ns | 1.53 ns | 1.33 ns | 0.43 ns | 10.44 ns | 0.50 ns |
| Residuals | 24 | 2.29 | 18.66 | 1.86 | 2.76 | 28.44 | 0.37 |
ⁿˢP > 0.05; *P < = 0.05; **P < = 0.01
df Degrees of freedom, DFF Days to 50% flowering, PH Plant Height, PL Panicle Length, NPT Number of Productive Tillers, SPY Single Plant Yield, TGW 1000 grain weight