Table 6.
Systems-based mapping of implementation barriers and recommendations for sustaining the “Xinjiang Model”
| System domain | Main barriers identified | Operational implications | Actionable recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health workforce | Workforce fragility, limited professional capacity, high workload, staff turnover | Reduced quality and continuity of screening, follow-up, referral coordination, and patient management | Establish minimum staffing arrangements for TB prevention and control teams; provide workload-based compensation; strengthen continuous professional training |
| Health financing | Gaps in nutrition support, screening reimbursement, and residual out-of-pocket costs | Financial pressure on patients and institutions; weakened treatment adherence and service uptake | Adjust nutrition subsidy standards; reimburse screening for persons with presumptive TB and close contacts; reduce residual out-of-pocket costs |
| Service delivery | Pressure on universal health check-ups; referral delays; difficulties in sputum collection and follow-through | Reduced screening quality, delayed diagnosis, delayed treatment initiation, and interrupted continuity of care | Standardize referral timelines; strengthen feedback between screening sites and designated TB hospitals; improve sputum collection guidance; optimize screening workflows |
| Patient-centered support | Physical and psychological vulnerability | Interrupted treatment and poor continuity of care | Integrate psychosocial support, family involvement, and practical assistance into community-based follow-up |
| Governance | Policy misalignment and lack of detailed operational guidance for some components of the model | Inconsistent implementation across settings and difficulty sustaining some program components | Develop clearer operational protocols, accountability mechanisms, and routine monitoring requirements |