Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan;44(1):71–76. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.71-76.2006

TABLE 2.

Discrepancies between identification with the VITEK 2 system and by reference method

Species No. of strains tested Genotype determined by PCR assay Species identification (no. [%] of strains)
Phenotype (no. of strains) by:
Correct Discordant
Reference method VITEK 2 method
E. faecium 1 Wild type 1 0
E. faecium 66 vanA 60 (90.9) 6 E. faecium (3) E. faecium-E. gallinarum
E. faecium (2) E. faecium-E. gallinarum-E. casseliflavus
E. faecium (1) E. faecium-E. hirae-E. gallinarum
E. faecium 14 vanB 14 (100) 0
E. gallinarum 30 vanC1 30 (100) 0
E. casseliflavus 10 vanC2 9 (90) 1 E. casseliflavus (1) E. casseliflavus-E. gallinarum
    Total 121 114 (94.2) 7 (5.8)