Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 28;332(7535):209–213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38664.482060.55

Table 5.

Results of reduced random effects probit model, overall and by site

Across sites*
Urban site
Rural site
Variable Coeff (95% CI) P value§ Coeff (95% CI) P value§ Coeff (95% CI) P value§
Low travel time (<30 mins) −0.02 (−0.15 to 0.11) 0.782 0.37 (0.20 to 0.55) <0.001 −0.62 (−0.85 to −0.39) <0.001
High travel time (>3 hours) −0.07 (−0.20 to 0.07) 0.342 0.17 (−0.01 to 0.35) 0.076 −0.28 (−0.53 to −0.19) 0.036
PEP with HIV test 1.71 (1.57 to 1.85) <0.001 1.52 (1.35 to 1.70) <0.001 2.36 (2.05 to 2.67) <0.001
PEP without HIV test 0.70 (0.59 to 0.82) <0.001 1.05 (0.89 to 1.22) <0.001 0.33 (0.16 to 0.49) <0.001
Returns to service 0.14 (0.11 to 0.17) <0.001 0.06 (0.02 to 0.09) 0.005 0.36 (0.29 to 0.42) <0.001
Long examination 0.48 (0.39 to 0.58) <0.001 0.49 (0.36 to 0.63) <0.001 0.80 (0.62 to 0.97) <0.001
Providers with no understanding −0.75 (−0.88 to −0.62) <0.001 −0.32 (−0.50 to −0.14) 0.001 −0.98 (−1.19 to −0.76) <0.001
Providers with understanding and training 0.56 (0.40 to 0.73) <0.001 0.59 (0.37 to 0.81) <0.001 0.89 (0.58 to 1.20) <0.001
Constant −0.13 (−0.33 to 0.08) 0.239 −0.97 (−0.13 to −0.68) <0.001 0.48 (0.14 to 0.83) 0.006

PEP=postexposure prophylaxis.

*

Likelihood ratio 1533.91, P<0.001 (χ2); likelihood test of r=0: 177.72, P<0.001 (χ2).

Likelihood ratio 512.77, P>0.001 (χ2); likelihood test of r=0: 67.91, P<0.001 (χ2).

Likelihood ratio 1304.87, P<0.001 (χ2); likelihood test of r=0: 39.87, P<0.001 (χ2).

§

From random effects probit model. P> absolute value of z.