Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 29;16:26943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-59234-y

Table 1.

Performance comparison with state-of-the-art methods on BUSI dataset.

Methods Dice (%) IoU (%) Precision (%) Recall (%)
U-Net 82.7 ± 0.6 70.6 ± 0.7 83.5 ± 0.6 82.0 ± 0.7
U-Net +  +  84.1 ± 0.6 72.6 ± 0.6 84.9 ± 0.6 83.4 ± 0.6
Attention U-Net 85.3 ± 0.5 74.4 ± 0.6 86.1 ± 0.5 84.6 ± 0.6
TransUNet 86.2 ± 0.7 75.8 ± 0.8 89.1 ± 0.6 83.6 ± 0.9
Swin-UNet 87.1 ± 0.5 77.3 ± 0.5 88.0 ± 0.6 86.3 ± 0.6
UNeXt 84.6 ± 0.6 73.3 ± 0.7 85.3 ± 0.6 83.9 ± 0.7
UNETR +  +  86.7 ± 0.6 76.6 ± 0.6 88.5 ± 0.5 85.2 ± 0.6
MedNeXt 87.4 ± 0.5 78.1 ± 0.5 88.1 ± 0.5 86.8 ± 0.5
USEANet 87.6 ± 0.5 78.3 ± 0.5 88.6 ± 0.6 86.9 ± 0.5
Wave-GMS 87.9 ± 0.4 78.7 ± 0.5 88.8 ± 0.5 87.2 ± 0.5
CEA-Net (Ours) 88.3 ± 0.5 79.2 ± 0.6 89.3 ± 0.5 87.8 ± 0.5

Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation over five-fold cross-validation.