Table 4.
Ablation study on the contribution of each module.
| Configuration | Dice (%) | IoU (%) | Params (M) | Latency (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive addition on BUSI dataset | ||||
| Baseline (U-Net Structure) | 79.2 ± 0.9 | 65.5 ± 1.0 | 31.0 | 18.7 |
| + Lightweight Encoder | 83.5 ± 0.7 | 71.7 ± 0.8 | 0.75 | 9.8 |
| + Attention Module | 85.8 ± 0.6 | 75.1 ± 0.7 | 0.83 | 11.3 |
| + Dynamic Inference | 87.1 ± 0.6 | 77.2 ± 0.6 | 0.83 | 11.5 |
| Full CEA-Net | 88.3 ± 0.5 | 79.2 ± 0.6 | 0.83 | 11.8 |
| Component removal on TN3K dataset | ||||
| w/o Dynamic Inference | 85.1 ± 0.5 | 74.2 ± 0.6 | 0.83 | 11.6 |
| w/o Attention Module | 84.3 ± 0.6 | 72.8 ± 0.5 | 0.75 | 9.8 |
| w/o Lightweight Encoder | 81.8 ± 0.7 | 69.2 ± 0.8 | 31.0 | 18.3 |
| Full CEA-Net | 86.9 ± 0.4 | 77.0 ± 0.5 | 0.83 | 11.8 |
All latency measurements conducted on NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU with fixed 4-stage decoding to ensure fair comparison across configurations. Dice and IoU are reported as mean ± standard deviation over five-fold cross-validation.