Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 29;16:26943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-59234-y

Table 4.

Ablation study on the contribution of each module.

Configuration Dice (%) IoU (%) Params (M) Latency (ms)
Progressive addition on BUSI dataset
 Baseline (U-Net Structure) 79.2 ± 0.9 65.5 ± 1.0 31.0 18.7
 + Lightweight Encoder 83.5 ± 0.7 71.7 ± 0.8 0.75 9.8
 + Attention Module 85.8 ± 0.6 75.1 ± 0.7 0.83 11.3
 + Dynamic Inference 87.1 ± 0.6 77.2 ± 0.6 0.83 11.5
 Full CEA-Net 88.3 ± 0.5 79.2 ± 0.6 0.83 11.8
Component removal on TN3K dataset
 w/o Dynamic Inference 85.1 ± 0.5 74.2 ± 0.6 0.83 11.6
 w/o Attention Module 84.3 ± 0.6 72.8 ± 0.5 0.75 9.8
 w/o Lightweight Encoder 81.8 ± 0.7 69.2 ± 0.8 31.0 18.3
 Full CEA-Net 86.9 ± 0.4 77.0 ± 0.5 0.83 11.8

All latency measurements conducted on NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU with fixed 4-stage decoding to ensure fair comparison across configurations. Dice and IoU are reported as mean ± standard deviation over five-fold cross-validation.