Skip to main content
. 2002 Aug;184(16):4582–4593. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.16.4582-4593.2002

TABLE 7.

In silico results compared to experimental results for the essentiality of 17 genes in the modela

Deleted reaction Gene(s) Locus identification(s) In vitro essentiality In silico essentiality in medium
Agree- ment
Minimal Minimal + glucose Minimal + carbon sources Minimal + carbon sources + amino acids
ACPS acpS HP0808 E Yes
AROQ aroQ HP1038 E Yes
DCD dcd HP0372 NE + + + + Yes
EDA eda HP1099 E + + + +
EDD edd HP1100 E + + + +
FBP fbp HP1385 E + + +
GLCD glcD HP0509 E Yes
GPT1/2/3 gpt HP0735 E + + + +
MQO mqo HP0086 E + +
MURB murB HP1418 E Yes
MURF murF HP0740 E Yes
OOR oorA, oorB, oorC, oorD HP0589, HP0590, HP0591, HP0588 E + + + +
POR porA, porB, porC, porD HP1110, HP1111, HP1108, HP1109 E Yes
PYRE pyrE HP1257 E Yes
SPEE speE HP0832 NE
TAL tal HP1495 NE + + + + Yes
TRXB trxA, trxB HP0824, HP0825 E Yes
a

All of the essential in silico predictions are shaded, with a − sign indicating the inability to produce the biomass demands. The in vitro essentiality data is taken from reference 10 (E, essential; NE, not essential).