Table 3.
NAWM group comparison.
| NAWM Mean intensity | NAWM CoV | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low EDSS | High EDSS | p-value | Low EDSS | High EDSS | p-value | |
| R1 | 0.972 ± 0.044 | 0.956 ± 0.047 | 0.0081 | 0.070 ± 0.013 | 0.076 ± 0.015 | 0.0027 |
| Unprocessed T1w | 53,873.9 ± 6154.9 | 52,025.8 ± 8156.6 | 0.0695 | 0.109 ± 0.008 | 0.114 ± 0.012 | 0.0031 |
| Bias-corrected T1w | 25,187.8 ± 3084.7 | 25,610.6 ± 3391.1 | 0.3218 | 0.062 ± 0.010 | 0.072 ± 0.015 | 1.636E-07 * |
| Signal modeling | 2.155 ± 0.128 | 2.136 ± 0.107 | 0.1833 | 0.062 ± 0.010 | 0.073 ± 0.015 | 1.648E-07 * |
| Linear scaling (fatty tissue) | 0.918 ± 0.055 | 0.905 ± 0.046 | 0.0344 | 0.062 ± 0.010 | 0.072 ± 0.015 | 1.636E-07 * |
| Linear scaling (temporal muscle) | 2.174 ± 0.160 | 2.197 ± 0.137 | 0.1989 | 0.062 ± 0.010 | 0.072 ± 0.015 | 1.636E-07 * |
Bold numbers indicate p-values < 0.05, i.e., statistically significant results.
Abbreviations: CoV: coefficient of variation, EDSS: expanded disability status scale, NAWM: normal-appearing white matter, T1w: T1-weighted.
remains significant in ANCOVA with age, sex, disease duration, and lesion volume as covariates.