Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2025 Jul 23;318:121395. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121395

Table 3.

NAWM group comparison.

NAWM Mean intensity NAWM CoV
Low EDSS High EDSS p-value Low EDSS High EDSS p-value
R1 0.972 ± 0.044 0.956 ± 0.047 0.0081 0.070 ± 0.013 0.076 ± 0.015 0.0027
Unprocessed T1w 53,873.9 ± 6154.9 52,025.8 ± 8156.6 0.0695 0.109 ± 0.008 0.114 ± 0.012 0.0031
Bias-corrected T1w 25,187.8 ± 3084.7 25,610.6 ± 3391.1 0.3218 0.062 ± 0.010 0.072 ± 0.015 1.636E-07 *
Signal modeling 2.155 ± 0.128 2.136 ± 0.107 0.1833 0.062 ± 0.010 0.073 ± 0.015 1.648E-07 *
Linear scaling (fatty tissue) 0.918 ± 0.055 0.905 ± 0.046 0.0344 0.062 ± 0.010 0.072 ± 0.015 1.636E-07 *
Linear scaling (temporal muscle) 2.174 ± 0.160 2.197 ± 0.137 0.1989 0.062 ± 0.010 0.072 ± 0.015 1.636E-07 *

Bold numbers indicate p-values < 0.05, i.e., statistically significant results.

Abbreviations: CoV: coefficient of variation, EDSS: expanded disability status scale, NAWM: normal-appearing white matter, T1w: T1-weighted.

*

remains significant in ANCOVA with age, sex, disease duration, and lesion volume as covariates.