Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 18;17:1919103. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1919103

Table 5.

Baseline characteristics and measles seronegativity before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

Variable Unmatched cohort Model 1: total effect model Model 2: controlled direct effect model
Demographic balance
Age (years, Mean ± SD) 9.82 ± 6.14 vs. 8.45 ± 5.92(SMD=0.228) 8.45 ± 5.92 vs. 8.51 ± 5.88(SMD=0.010) 8.45 ± 5.92 vs. 8.48 ± 5.90(SMD=0.005)
Sex (Male, %) 52.41% vs. 54.43% (SMD=0.041) 54.43% vs. 53.80% (SMD=0.013) 54.43% vs. 54.43% (SMD=0.000)
Region (Xinjiang, %) 55.17% vs. 68.35% (SMD=0.273) 68.35% vs. 68.35% (SMD=0.000) 68.35% vs. 68.35% (SMD=0.000)
Ethnicity (Han, %) 58.18% vs. 51.90% (SMD=0.126) 51.90% vs. 52.53% (SMD=0.013) 51.90% vs. 51.90% (SMD=0.000)
MCV Doses (2 Doses, %) 74.49% vs. 73.42% (SMD=0.024) 73.42% vs. 75.32% (SMD=0.043) 73.42% vs. 73.42% (SMD=0.000)
Primary outcome
Seronegativity Rate (%) 15.74% (303/1925) vs. 11.39% (18/158) 15.82% (25/158) vs. 11.39% (18/158) 15.19% (24/158) vs. 11.39% (18/158)
Effect estimates
Odds Ratio (OR/AOR) Crude OR=0.69 (95% CI:0.41–1.14) Total OR=0.68 (95% CI:0.36–1.31) Direct AOR=0.72 (95% CI:0.37–1.38)
P-value P=0.147 P=0.252 P=0.316

SMD < 0.10 indicates adequate balance between matched cohorts.

Model 1 assesses the Total Causal Effect by matching strictly on baseline confounders (age, sex, region, ethnicity) without adjusting for downstream vaccination history.

Model 2 assesses the Controlled Direct Effect by matching on baseline confounders plus MCV dose history (0/1/2/≥3 doses) to evaluate whether antibody levels differ given identical vaccination regimens.