Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 20;21:522. doi: 10.1186/s13018-026-07043-4

Table 2.

Comparison between surgical and conservative treatment groups

Variable Surgical group (n = 27) Conservative group (n = 12) P value
Age, years 71 (68.5–72.5) 77 (70.5–80.5) 0.077
Male sex 9 (33.3%) 6 (50.0%) 0.478
Referral cases 25 (92.6%) 11 (91.7%) 1.000
Diabetes mellitus 2 (7.4%) 0 (0.0%) 1.000
Hypertension 10 (37.0%) 4 (33.3%) 1.000
Coronary artery disease 1 (3.7%) 2 (16.7%) 0.219
Chronic kidney disease 1 (3.7%) 1 (8.3%) 0.526
Steroid or immunosuppressive use 2 (7.4%) 2 (16.7%) 0.573
Serum albumin, g/L 32.5 (31.9–36.5) 34.3 (32–37.2) 0.643
WBC, ×10⁹/L 6.2 (4.6–7.9) 6.0 (4.4–8.2) 0.867
CRP, mg/L 15 (11.4–58.0) 26.8 (16.5–43.0) 0.403
ESR, mm/h 44 (24.5–74) 66 (28.8–84.5) 0.369
Fever 12 (44.4%) 8 (66.7%) 0.301
Back pain 27 (100.0%) 12 (100.0%) 1.000
Preoperative neurological impairment (ASIA grade D) 7 (25.9%) 3 (25.0%) 1.000
Spinal tuberculosis 6 (22.2%) 2 (16.7%) 1.000
Preoperative ODI score 40 (22.5–57.5) 35 (28.8–40) 0.375
Final ODI score 9 (6.5–14) 27.5 (18.2–35) < 0.001
Mortality 2 (7.4%) 1 (8.3%) 1.000

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or n (%). Continuous variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. P values are provided for descriptive comparison only