Table 5.
Regression results testing the moderating role of adolescents’ own peer acceptance.
| Genders | Regression model | R2 | F | b | SE | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcomes | Predictors | ||||||
| Boys | Friendship quality (M1) | Best friends’ Dep (X) | 0.002 | 0.35 | −0.04 | 0.050 | [−0.14, 0.06] |
| Rumination (M2) | Best friends’ Dep | 0.03 | 5.13** | 0.08 | 0.047 | [−0.01, 0.17] | |
| Adolescents’ own Dep (Y) | Best friends’ Dep | 0.52 | 57.23*** | 0.03* | 0.013 | [0.001, 0.05] | |
| Friendship quality | −0.06*** | 0.013 | [−0.08, −0.03] | ||||
| Rumination | 0.27*** | 0.013 | [0.24, 0.29] | ||||
| Adolescents’ own peer Acp (W2) |
−0.01 | 0.013 | [−0.04, 0.01] | ||||
| Int1(X × W2) | 0.02 | 0.013 | [−0.009, 0.04] | ||||
| Int2(M1 × W2) | 0.001 | 0.013 | [−0.02, 0.03] | ||||
| Int3(M2 × W2) | −0.003 | 0.012 | [−0.03, 0.02] | ||||
| Girls | Friendship quality | Best friends’ Dep | 0.02 | 2.52* | −0.10* | 0.042 | [−0.18, −0.02] |
| Rumination | Best friends’ Dep | 0.03 | 5.27** | 0.10* | 0.044 | [0.01, 0.18] | |
| Adolescents’ own Dep | Best friends’ Dep | 0.57 | 66.00*** | 0.04** | 0.013 | [0.02, 0.07] | |
| Friendship quality | −0.07*** | 0.014 | [−0.10, −0.04] | ||||
| Rumination | 0.29*** | 0.013 | [0.26, 0.31] | ||||
| Adolescents’ own peer Acp |
−0.04** | 0.015 | [−0.07, −0.01] | ||||
| Int1(X × W2) | 0.02 | 0.014 | [−0.01, 0.05] | ||||
| Int2(M1 × W2) | 0.001 | 0.015 | [−0.03, 0.03] | ||||
| Int3(M2 × W2) | −0.03* | 0.014 | [−0.06, −0.01] | ||||
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Dep = depressive symptoms, Acp = acceptance. All regression models included grade and only-child status as covariates.