Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 19;17:1909249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1909249

Table 5.

Regression results testing the moderating role of adolescents’ own peer acceptance.

Genders Regression model R2 F b SE 95%CI
Outcomes Predictors
Boys Friendship quality (M1) Best friends’ Dep (X) 0.002 0.35 −0.04 0.050 [−0.14, 0.06]
Rumination (M2) Best friends’ Dep 0.03 5.13** 0.08 0.047 [−0.01, 0.17]
Adolescents’ own Dep (Y) Best friends’ Dep 0.52 57.23*** 0.03* 0.013 [0.001, 0.05]
Friendship quality −0.06*** 0.013 [−0.08, −0.03]
Rumination 0.27*** 0.013 [0.24, 0.29]
Adolescents’ own
peer Acp (W2)
−0.01 0.013 [−0.04, 0.01]
Int1(X × W2) 0.02 0.013 [−0.009, 0.04]
Int2(M1 × W2) 0.001 0.013 [−0.02, 0.03]
Int3(M2 × W2) −0.003 0.012 [−0.03, 0.02]
Girls Friendship quality Best friends’ Dep 0.02 2.52* −0.10* 0.042 [−0.18, −0.02]
Rumination Best friends’ Dep 0.03 5.27** 0.10* 0.044 [0.01, 0.18]
Adolescents’ own Dep Best friends’ Dep 0.57 66.00*** 0.04** 0.013 [0.02, 0.07]
Friendship quality −0.07*** 0.014 [−0.10, −0.04]
Rumination 0.29*** 0.013 [0.26, 0.31]
Adolescents’ own
peer Acp
−0.04** 0.015 [−0.07, −0.01]
Int1(X × W2) 0.02 0.014 [−0.01, 0.05]
Int2(M1 × W2) 0.001 0.015 [−0.03, 0.03]
Int3(M2 × W2) −0.03* 0.014 [−0.06, −0.01]

***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. Dep = depressive symptoms, Acp = acceptance. All regression models included grade and only-child status as covariates.