Table 4.
Comparison of postoperative success rates(%) between the two groups [n; Percentage (%)]
| Post.1d (%) | Post.1w (%) | Post. 1 m (%) | Post. 3 m (%) | Post. 6 m (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCP complete success | 12(30%) | 16(40%) | 24(60%) | 25(62.5%) | 23(57.5%) |
| UCP qualified success | 4(10%) | 13(32.5%) | 6(15%) | 7(15%) | 6(15%) |
| UCP Total Success | 16(40%) | 29(72.5%) | 34(75%) | 37(77.5%) | 31(72.5%) |
| AGV complete success | 24(60%) | 23(57.5%) | 26(65%) | 24(60%) | 23(57.5%) |
| AGV qualified success | 9(22.5%) | 8(20%) | 6(15%) | 7(17.5%) | 4(10%) |
| AGV Total Success | 33(82.5%) | 31(77.5%) | 32(80%) | 31(77.5%) | 27(67.5%) |
| P | < 0.05 | 0.797 | 0.770 | 0.115 | 0.453 |
UCP= Ultrasound cycloplasty; AGV= Ahmed glaucoma valve