Skip to main content
. 2002 Nov;184(21):6050–6055. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.21.6050-6055.2002

TABLE 3.

Prevalence of puvA (ORF5) in K1 and non-K1 E. coli

Strains Sourcea % of isolates with ORF5 (no. tested)b Pc
018:K1:H7 RS, DSMZ, or JJ 85.7 (28)
Other (non-O18) K1 WV or JJ 0.0 (38) <0.0001
ECORd HO 4.2 (72) 0.0001
ECOR-likee JJ 0.0 (11) <0.0001
ECORf JJ 11.8 (17)
a

RS, Richard Silver, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y.; DSMZ, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany; JJ, James Johnson, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,; WV, Willie Vann, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Md.; HO, Howard Ochman, University of Arizona, Tucson.

b

Detected by PCR analysis with the puvA-specific primers given in Table 1. All O18:K1:H7 strains were also analyzed for ORF6 and ORF7 with the primers indicated in Table 1 and covaried with ORF5.

c

P values were determined by Fisher's exact test by comparison to the O18:K1:H7 strains; values of <0.01 were considered significant.

d

The ECOR collection (14) is considered representative of the worldwide diversity of E. coli strains.

e

#51 (O25:K+) and #57 (O2:K5/7:H1), two of the three ORF5-positive strains from the ECOR collection (both from the B2 group), are similar to strains BOS 031 and BOS 080 and to strains V27, H19, V6, V24, and H1, respectively, which unlike #51 and #57 were negative for puvA. Strains more distantly related to #51 (BOS 70, BOS 100, BOS 77, and BOS 56) were also tested and found to be negative.

f

ECOR strains #51 to #57, #59 to #66, #35, and #36. Strains #51 and #57 were kindly provided by an alternative source (James Johnson) and gave the same results as the equivalent strains obtained from Howard Ochman.