Table 1. Comparison of in extracto cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) with traditional in vitro and in situ cryogenic electron tomography (cryo-ET) approaches to structural biology.
| Cryo-EM method Features |
In vitro (traditional single particle) |
In extracto (this work) |
In situ (e.g. cryo-ET) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactions with cellular components | – * | +/– | + |
| Purified macromolecules | + | +/– (can be added) |
– |
| Time-resolved cryo-EM | + | + | – |
| Fast sample and grid preparation, and data collection to enable near-atomic resolution | + (hours to an overnight session) |
+ (1–3 overnight sessions) |
– (days/weeks) |
| Efficient particle identification (low # of false positives) | + | + | +/– |
*+ Means straightforward, – difficult/impossible, +/– possible.