Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 21;17:1918092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1918092

Table 2.

Responses of various groups to different stimulus types at different cues (X_ ± SD, ms).

Group Stimulus type Cues
No cues Dual cues
Elites Neutral 492.23 ± 40.72** 472.09 ± 31.70**
Congruent 498.87 ± 40.70** 481.18 ± 36.39**
Incongruent 568.10 ± 41.00** 550.15 ± 39.45**
Novices Neutral 534.02 ± 59.87 520.59 ± 55.66
Congruent 553.42 ± 61.87 531.13 ± 61.42
Incongruent 634.38 ± 71.80 618.40 ± 68.51

Post hoc comparisons adjusted using the Bonferroni correction: compared with the novice group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Significance is based on post hoc comparisons following a significant main effect of group in the 2 (group) × 2 (cue) × 3 (target) three-way mixed-design ANOVA.