Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 21;17:1918092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1918092

Table 7.

Alerting -induced P2 latency at different cortical sites (X_ ± SD, ms).

Group Cues Prefrontal Frontal Frontal-central Central
Novices Dual cue 128.59 ± 23.31## 130.99 ± 20.53## 132.72 ± 21.32## 141.91 ± 28.10##
Elites Dual cue 119.21 ± 19.62## 122.14 ± 18.69## 128.21 ± 21.00## 143.01 ± 25.17##
Novices No cue 152.81 ± 30.24 154.74 ± 25.70 157.02 ± 25.46 156.41 ± 27.87
Elites No cue 154.25 ± 31.07 158.59 ± 26.81 159.35 ± 24.82 162.13 ± 25.01

Post hoc comparisons based on Bonferroni correction: compared with the novice group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; compared with the no-cue condition, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01. Significance is based on post hoc comparisons following a significant main effect of group or cue in the 2 (group) × 2 (cue) × 4 (brain region) three-factor mixed-design ANOVA.