Skip to main content
. 2001 Mar;13(3):553–570. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.3.553

Table 2.

Quantification of hmudrB and mudrB Transcript Levels in Mutator and Non-Mutator Maize Lines

Relative Expression in Probe Regions Indicated (%)b,c
Line Mutator MuDR Copiesa 4298–4496 4332–4496 4087–4222 3782–4222
hmudrB
  a1-mum2d No 0 1.0 (100) 1.0 (100) 1.0 (100)
  bz2 No 0 2.9 (100) 3.9 (100) 2.9 (100)
  bz2-mu1 No >20e 3.3 (100) 4.0 (100) 2.8 (100)
  bz2-mu2 Yes 9–11 24.3 (26.6) NDf ND
  bz2-mu2 Yes 18–24 52.8 (28.8) 59.4 (29.0) 54.8 (31.7)
  a1-mum2 Yes 1 3.7 (20.9) 3.7 (20.9) 4.4 (24.7)
  a1-mum2 Yes 1(d201) ND 1.2 (100) 1.4 (100)
  a1-mum2 Yes 6–8 16.7 (25.8) 18.1 (25.9) 21.5 (27.5)
  a1-mum2 Yes 10–12 26.7 (26.5) ND ND
mudrB
  a1-mum2 No 0 0 0 0 0
  bz2 No 0 0 0 0 0
  bz2-mu1 No >20e 0 0 0 0
  bz2-mu2 Yes 9–11 9.6 ND ND ND
  bz2-mu2 Yes 18-24 18.6 21.1 19.5 22.3
  a1-mum2d Yes 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
  a1-mum2 Yes 1(d201) 0 0 0 0
  a1-mum2 Yes 6–8 6.9 7.5 8.3 7.4
  a1-mum2 Yes 10–12 10.6 ND ND ND
a

Copy number was estimated from the intensity of hybridization to the 4.7-kb SstI band of MuDR by DNA blot hybridization.

b

Probe identity to various hMuDR elements is indicated in Table 1.

c

Percentage is calculated as the contribution of hmudrB transcripts in the total pool of hmudrB plus mudrB transcripts in the sample. Details are provided in Methods.

d

Hybridization to total RNA from this line was set as 1.0, and all other measurements are relative to it.

e

Copy number estimate from Walbot and Stapleton (1998).

f

ND, not determined.