Skip to main content
. 2026 Aug 26;17:1929366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1929366

Table 2.

Latent profile analysis model fit indices on the screened sample (k = 1 to 6; N = 489).

Profiles (k) Log-likelihood AIC BIC aBIC Entropy
1 −1387.7 2783.5 2800.3 2787.6 -
2 −1258.0 2534.1 2571.8 2543.2 0.61
3 −1207.3 2442.6 2501.3 2456.8 0.73
4 (selected) −1187.6 2413.2 2492.9 2432.6 0.65
5 −1172.6 2393.3 2493.9 2417.7 0.70
6 −1161.6 2381.1 2502.7 2410.7 0.78

AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; aBIC, sample-size-adjusted BIC. Lower values indicate better fit; entropy closer to 1 indicates clearer classification. The BIC was minimized at k = 4 (narrowly relative to k = 5, ΔBIC = 1.0); the aBIC and AIC continued to decrease through k = 6; entropy was moderate at k = 4 and somewhat higher at k = 5 and k = 6. The four-profile solution was selected on BIC, parsimony, and interpretability (Section 3.3).