Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 24;26:1627. doi: 10.1186/s12879-026-13874-7

Table 2.

Risk of bias results

Study (Year) Selection (0–5) Comparability (0–2) Outcome (0–3) Total NOS Score Quality Rating
Lubega 2005 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Brown 2005 2 2 2 6 Moderate risk
Ige 2012 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Okoromah 2012 2 2 2 6 Moderate risk
Miller 2013 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Chelo 2015 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Arodiwe 2016 2 2 2 6 Moderate risk
Namuyonga 2016 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Sanyahumbi 2017 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Majonga 2018 3 2 3 8 Low risk
McCrary 2018 4 2 3 9 Low risk
Manafe 2019 2 2 2 6 Moderate risk
Frigati 2019 4 2 3 9 Low risk
Mahtab 2020 4 2 3 9 Low risk
McCrary 2020 4 2 3 9 Low risk
Duru 2020 2 2 2 6 Moderate risk
Majonga 2020 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Wubayehu 2020 3 2 3 8 Low risk
Arodiwe 2023 2 2 2 6 Moderate risk
Garba 2023 3 2 3 8 Low risk