Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 1;13:1942320. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1942320

Figure 2.

Forest plot graphic showing adjusted odds ratios for variables independently associated with HFpEF versus HFrEF, including age, sex, obesity, ischaemic cardiomyopathy, AF/flutter, hypertension, diabetes, malnutrition, Charlson CCI, mitral regurgitation, and CKD, with significant associations highlighted in color and listing confidence intervals and p-values.

Variables independently associated with HFpEF versus HFrEF. Forest plot showing adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from the multivariable logistic regression model comparing HFpEF with HFrEF. The model included age, sex, obesity, ischaemic cardiomyopathy, AF/flutter, hypertension, diabetes, malnutrition, Charlson CCI, MR ≥ moderate, and CKD stage. Age was analysed per standard deviation increase, and CKD stage was analysed as an ordinal variable. Adjusted odds ratios greater than 1 indicate higher odds of HFpEF compared with HFrEF, whereas adjusted odds ratios lower than 1 indicate lower odds of HFpEF compared with HFrEF. The vertical dashed line represents an adjusted odds ratio of 1. The model included 1,146 patients and had a Nagelkerke R² of 0.31. AF, atrial fibrillation; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; BMI, body mass index; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; MR, mitral regurgitation; SD, standard deviation.