Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 19;119(10):2045–2051. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002767

Table 2.

Continuity test of observed covariates

Variables Difference
Estimate 95% CI P value
Age −2.7 −6.4, +0.9 0.15
Male sex (%)a +1.31 −0.76, +2.39 0.73
HCV + HBV (vs others, %)a +2.10 −12.0, +16.2 0.80
MASLD (vs others, %)a −3.1 −9.3, +16.8 0.33
ARLD (vs others, %)a +2.5 −5.1, 10.0 0.61
Serum creatinine +0.034 −0.18, +0.25 0.76
Serum sodium −0.58 −1.99, +0.83 0.42
Serum albumin −0.103 −0.33, +0.13 0.38
Neutrophil count of ascites −1.93 −13.1, +9.22 0.74
MELD-Sodium score −0.78 −4.71, +3.15 0.7
MAP −1.11 −4.15, +1.93 0.48
Amount of ascites removed 0 −0.001, +0.001 1
Being on diuretics (vs none, %)a +2.26 −0.92, +4.48 0.4
Being on NSBB (vs none, %)a −0.87 −1.86, +1.04 0.3
Time to serum test collection from TP (days) −7.9 −18.5, 2.7 0.14

ARLD, alcohol-related liver disease; CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; NSBB, non-selective beta blocker; TP, therapeutic paracentesis.

a

Each 0.5 L increment of ascites was modeled (0–0.4, 0.5–0.9, 1–1.5, and so forth).