TABLE 2.
Origin of virus | Nucleotide diversity in comparison with populations from:
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UK | Brazil | G. Bissau | Zambia | Bangladesh | S. India | Japan | |
UK | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0007 | 0.0007 | 0.0007 | 0.0008 | 0.0008 |
Brasil | 0.0006 | 0.0005 | 0.0008 | 0.0007 | 0.0008 | 0.0009 | 0.0009 |
G. Bissau | 0.0009 | 0.0011 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 |
Zambia | 0.0009 | 0.0011 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 |
Bangladesh | 0.0009 | 0.0011 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 |
S. India | 0.0011 | 0.0012 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0005 |
Japan | 0.0011 | 0.0012 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.0006 | 0.0002 |
Diagonal (bold) values, within-population diversities (px); above diagonal values, net nucleotide diversity between populations (pA); below diagonal values, mean proportion of pairwise differences between populations (pxy). The 1.9-kb subset had higher than average diversity, so the values in Table 2 are adjusted accordingly (by a factor of 0.277). UK, United Kingdom; G. Bissau, Guinea Bissau; S. India, South India.