Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan;13(1):18–26. doi: 10.1101/lm.66106

Table 1.

Average reference memory errors per trial before and after stimulation/control in the different groups

Group Week - 2 Week - 1 Week 1 Week 4 Week 7
Control 10-AD 0.39 ± 0.14 0.1 ± 0.08 1.0 ± 0.34 0.88 ± 0.29 1.61 ± 0.32
10-AD 0.3 ± 0.14 0.25 ± 0.1 2.28 ± 0.27ab 1.88 ± 0.26ab 1.5 ± 0.31
Control 5-AD 0.33 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.08 0.63 ± 0.18 0.69 ± 0.26
5-AD 0.56 ± 0.15 0.29 ± 0.09 0.63 ± 0.08b 1.13 ± 0.24b
Control LTP 0.35 ± 0.15 0.24 ± 0.11 0.68 ± 0.19 1.21 ± 0.45
LTP 0.23 ± 0.06 0.19 ± 0.07 0.69 ± 0.27 0.88 ± 0.23

Week - 2 was the average of the eight trials from - 7 to -4 d before stimulation treatment, week - 1 was the average of six trials from - 3 to - 1 d before, and weeks 1, 4, and 7 are averages of four trials during the particular week after treatment. Treatment consisted of control group for 10 ADs, 10-AD group, control for 5 ADs, 5-AD group, control for the primed burst stimulation (PBS) or long-term potentiation group and the LTP group given 12 primed-burst train stimulation. All groups had eight rats except LTP, and its control groups had seven rats. Blank entries indicate data were not available.

a

P < 0.05, between one experimental group and its control group, post hoc Newman-Keuls test,

b

P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test, between 10-AD and 5-AD groups.