Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan;13(1):72–83. doi: 10.1101/lm.45506

Table 1.

Thermosensitivity and conditioning in eye-color mutant files

Thermosensitivity (PI ± SEM)
Place memory (PI ± SEM)
Genotype N 37°C 41°C N 37°C N 41°C
CS 140 0.49 ± 0.05 0.50 ± 0.05 163 0.27 ± 0.04 92 0.38 ± 0.06
w1 138 0.32 ± 0.04*** 0.50 ± 0.04 134 0.13 ± 0.04* 92 0.20 ± 0.06*
wa 140 0.37 ± 0.04* 0.50 ± 0.04 127 0.04 ± 0.04** 82 0.11 ± 0.06**
wa2 142 0.29 ± 0.05*** 0.46 ± 0.05 129 0.07 ± 0.04* 93 0.08 ± 0.06**
wa3 141 0.29 ± 0.04*** 0.42 ± 0.04 124 −0.01 ± 0.03*** 83 0.19 ± 0.06*
wec3 122 0.41 ± 0.06 0.45 ± 0.05 107 0.17 ± 0.05 91 0.26 ± 0.06
CS 103 0.72 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.03 162 0.35 ± 0.04 N.D.
bw1 59 0.67 ± 0.03 0.81 ± 0.03 161 0.25 ± 0.04 N.D.
st1 63 0.63 ± 0.05 0.72 ± 0.04 192 0.11 ± 0.03*** N.D.

Comparison of wild-type CS flies' performance to five white mutant alleles, brown (bw1), and scarlet (st1) mutant flies in a thermosensitivity test and the 3-min memory test with two reinforcing temperatures (37 and 41°C). In the thermosensitivity tests comparing wild-type CS flies with the white mutations, Kruskal-Wallis tests for each probe temperature are: 37°C, H = 38.87, P = 0.000; 41°C, H = 7.43, P = 0.19. Comparing wild-type CS flies with bw1 and st1 flies in the thermosensitivity tests found no significant differences with temperatures tested (37°C, H = 4.47, P = 0.10; 41°C, H = 4.50, P = 0.22). In tests for place memory using two different reinforcing temperatures, four of the five tested white alleles showed decreased performance with both temperatures (37°C, H = 25.60, P = 0.001; 41°C, H = 14.51, P = 0.013). The st1 but not bw1 mutation significantly reduced place memory using the 37°C reinforcer (H = 21.73, P = 0.000). Significance levels are shown for each genotype compared to wild-type CS flies performance tested in parallel. See legend of Figure 2 for levels of significance denoted by the asterisks.