Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2003 Sep;18(3):415–429. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.415

Table 3.

Correlations Between Parameter Values for Individual Subjects for Young Subjects

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. as 1.00
2. aa .53 1.00
3. Ter .15 .16 1.00
4. η .37 .02 .06 1.00
5. sz .63 .22 .16 .43 1.00
6. v1 .07 −.11 −.34 .47 −.02 1.00
7. v2 .01 −.27 −.25 .64 −.08 .79 1.00
8. v3 −.03 −.22 −.19 .63 −.14 .72 .94 1.00
9. v4 −.01 −.20 −.12 .71 −.06 .61 .91 .94 1.00
10. Po −.29 −.08 .07 −.25 −.04 −.18 −.18 −.22 −.15 1.00
11. st −.17 .10 .87 .08 .21 −.28 −.24 −.19 −.15 .13 1.00

Note. as = boundary separation for speed condition; aa = boundary separation for accuracy condition; Ter = mean of the nondecision component of response time; η = standard deviation in drift across trials; sz = range of the distribution of starting point (z); v = drift rates, po = proportion of contaminants; st = range of the distribution of the nondecision component of processing. A single correlation of plus or minus .31 would be significant at a .05 level.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure