Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 4;332(7536):266–270. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38705.470590.55

Table 2.

Effects of intervention on sleep related outcomes

Outcome Didgeridoo group Control group Raw difference*(95% CI) Adjusted difference(95% CI)
Epworth scale
At 4 months 7.4 (2.3) 9.6 (6.0)
Change from baseline −4.4 (3.7) −1.4 (2.6) −3.0 (−5.7 to −0.3), P=0.03 −2.8 (−5.4 to −0.2), P=0.04
Pittsburgh quality of sleep index



At 4 months 4.3 (2.1) 5.6 (2.7)
Change from baseline −0.9 (1.6) −0.2 (1.7) −0.7 (−2.1 to 0.6), P=0.27 −0.8 (−2.3 to 0.8), P=0.30
Partner rating of sleep disturbance



At 4 months 2.3 (1.4) 4.8 (2.2)
Change from baseline −3.4 (2.4) −0.6 (1.9) −2.8 (−4.7 to −0.9), P<0.01 −2.7 (−4.2 to −1.2), P<0.01
Apnoea-hypopnoea index



At 4 months 11.6 (8.1) 15.4 (9.8)
Change from baseline −10.7 (7.7) −4.5 (6.9) −6.2 (−12.3 to −0.1), P=0.05 −6.6 (−13.3 to −0.1), P=0.05
*

Two sample t tests.

Analysis of covariance with adjustment for severity of disease (apnoea-hypopnoea index and Epworth scale) and weight change during study period.