Table 3.
Comparisons of Effectiveness of Modalities, Defined as Abstinence or Reduction in Use and Stratified According to the Propensities of Receiving Treatment in One Modality versus Another
Propensity Score Strata | N in Modalitiesa | Abstinence OR (95% CI) | Reduction in Use OR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Inpatient (INP) versus Outpatient Drug-free (OP) | ||||
1 Propensity: ↓INP↑OP | NINP=17 | NOP=160 | 1.42 (0.43–4.58) | 3.38 (1.07–10.67)* |
2 | 64 | 116 | 0.88 (0.41–1.88) | 2.01 (1.04–3.87)* |
3 | 82 | 92 | 1.08 (0.48–2.41) | 0.83 (0.44–1.55) |
4 | 125 | 52 | 0.92 (0.45–1.91) | 0.75 (0.38–1.49) |
5 Propensity: ↑INP↓OP | 145 | 32 | 0.67 (0.26–1.71) | 0.91 (0.40–2.06) |
Conditional logistic regression | 433 | 452 | 0.96 (0.67–1.38) | 1.14 (0.84–1.56) |
Residential (RES) versus Outpatient Drug-free (OP) | ||||
1 Propensity: ↓RES↑OP | NRES=34 | NOP=138 | 0.27 (0.08–0.97)* | 0.50 (0.20–1.24) |
2 | 70 | 103 | 0.52 (0.20–1.33) | 0.91 (4.50–1.85) |
3 | 85 | 85 | 1.57 (0.63–3.89) | 0.66 (0.34–1.26) |
4 | 119 | 53 | 1.77 (0.71–4.40) | 0.95 (0.48–1.89) |
5 Propensity: ↑RES↓OP | 136 | 35 | 1.52 (0.62–3.74) | 1.27 (0.60–2.72) |
Conditional logistic regression | 444 | 414 | 0.95 (0.66–1.36) | 0.81 (0.61–1.09) |
Detox/Methadone (DT/MT) versus Outpatient Drug-free (OP) | ||||
1 Propensity: ↑DT/MT↓OP | NDT/MT=30 | NOP=144 | 1.63 (0.44–6.03) | 2.50 (0.90–6.96) |
2 | 42 | 131 | 1.52 (0.61–3.74) | 0.81 (0.36–1.82) |
3 | 82 | 92 | 0.87 (0.41–1.84) | 1.35 (0.70–2.59) |
4 | 96 | 77 | 0.70 (0.33–1.45) | 0.67 (0.35–1.29) |
5 Propensity: ↑DT/MT↓OP | 165 | 8 | 0.86 (0.10–7.56) | 1.09 (0.24–5.00) |
Conditional logistic regression | 415 | 452 | 0.86 (0.58–1.26) | 1.08 (0.78–1.49) |
Inpatient (INP) versus Detox/Methadone (DT/MT) | ||||
1 Propensity: ↓INP↑DT/MT | NINP=21 | NDT/MT=49 | 1.65 (0.51–5.35) | 0.95 (0.36–2.47) |
2 | 59 | 111 | 1.14 (0.49–2.63) | 1.46 (0.74–2.90) |
3 | 101 | 72 | 0.67 (0.30–1.50) | 0.81 (0.41–1.59) |
4 | 113 | 53 | 1.84 (0.77–4.42) | 2.30 (1.07–4.91)* |
5 Propensity: ↑INP↓DT/MT | 139 | 30 | 0.69 (0.21–2.26) | 0.72 (0.29–1.79) |
Conditional logistic regression | 433 | 415 | 1.32 (0.91–1.93) | 1.11 (0.81–1.51) |
Residential (RES) versus Detox/Methadone (DT/MT) | ||||
1 Propensity: ↓RES↑DT/MT | NRES=8 | NDT/MT=167 | 1.34 (0.25–7.19) | 0.37 (0.07–1.93) |
2 | 59 | 115 | 0.82 (0.30–2.23) | 0.63 (0.30–1.35) |
3 | 107 | 68 | 0.49 (0.21–1.14) | 1.01(0.50–2.03) |
4 | 137 | 38 | 0.94 (0.32–2.71) | 0.69 (0.28–1.72) |
5 Propensity: ↑RES↓DT/MT | 146 | 27 | 1.63 (0.52–5.06) | 1.24 (0.49–3.11) |
Conditional logistic regression | 457 | 415 | 0.98 (0.65–1.48) | 0.74 (0.53–1.03) |
Inpatient (INP) versus Residential (RES) | ||||
1 Propensity: ↓INP↑RES | NINP=26 | NRES=152 | 1.68 (0.68–4.16) | 1.80 (0.73–4.49) |
2 | 54 | 124 | 1.09 (0.49–2.44) | 1.49 (0.75–2.96) |
3 | 88 | 90 | 0.77 (0.33–1.84) | 1.62 (0.84–3.15) |
4 | 111 | 67 | 1.85 (0.74–4.59) | 1.01(0.52–2.00) |
5 Propensity: ↑INP↓RES | 154 | 24 | 4.57 (0.84–24.88) | 2.86 (0.85–9.55) |
Conditional logistic regression | 433 | 457 | 1.36 (0.94–1.97) | 1.59 (1.17–2.17)** |
Note: Analyses within each propensity quartile were weighted by the probability weights provided by SROS.
Numbers for some modalities vary across comparisons because of missing data in the independent variables used to derive propensity scores for those comparisons.
P<.05
P<.01
P<.001