Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr;38(2):515–533. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00131

Table 4.

Effect of the New Jersey Health Care Reform Act on Mechanical Revascularization Rates (Angioplasty or CABG)

Insured Patients Uninsured Patients


Risk Adjustment Risk Adjustment


No Yes No Yes
Constant 0.0772*** 0.3934*** 0.0589*** 0.0513
New Jersey 0.0501*** 0.0541*** 0.0644** 0.0651***
1991 0.0433*** 0.0415*** 0.0460* 0.0455**
1992 0.0925*** 0.0920*** 0.1072*** 0.1049***
1993 0.1281*** 0.1284*** 0.1363*** 0.1349***
1994 0.1726*** 0.1710*** 0.2086*** 0.2031***
1995 0.2314*** 0.2266*** 0.3025*** 0.2954***
1996 0.2729*** 0.2701*** 0.3359*** 0.3319***
Interaction—NJ and 1993 −0.0035 −0.0068 −0.0152 0.0132
Interaction—NJ and 1994 −0.0075 −0.0135** −0.0404 −0.0440
Interaction—NJ and 1995 −0.0395*** −0.0399*** −0.1388*** −0.1408***
Interaction—NJ and 1996 −0.0362*** −0.0374*** −0.1085*** −0.1132***
Number of observations 273,878 273,878 12,762 12,762
F value 1177 1005.8 67.8 33.0
Adjusted R2 .05 .10 .05 .07
Test of controls 15.3 (.00) 13.6 (.00) .03 (.70) .03 (.72)

Asterisks indicate the level of significance:

*

<.05,

**

<.01,

***

<.001.