Table 1.
Performance Measures and Standards: 1993
| Efficiency Standards | |
| Minimum service delivery (% of contracted amount) | 90% |
| Minimum service delivery to primary clients (% of units delivered) | 70% |
| Number of standards to be met* | 2 of 2 |
| Effectiveness Standards | |
| Abstinence/drug free 30 days prior to termination | 70%** |
| Reduction of use of primary SA problem | 60% |
| Maintaining employment | 90% |
| Employment improvement | 30% |
| Employability | 3% |
| Reduction in number of problems with employer | 70% |
| Reduction in absenteeism | 50% |
| Not arrested for OUI offense during treatment | 70% |
| Not arrested for any offense | 95% |
| Participation in self help during treatment | 40% |
| Reduction of problems with spouse/significant other | 65% |
| Reduction of problems with other family members | 65% |
| Number of standards to be met | 8 of 12 |
| Special Population Standards | |
| Female | 30% |
| Age: 0–19 | 10% |
| Age: 50+ | 6% |
| Corrections | 25% |
| Homeless | 1% |
| Concurrent psychological problems | 8% |
| History of IV drug use | 12% |
| Poly-drug use | 35% |
| Number of standards to be met | 5 of 8 |
Number of standards to be met is the number of indicators the program must meet to be deemed to have performed in that category.
The minimum percent of total clients which must meet the indicator for the program to be deemed to have met that indicator.
Source: Commons, McGuire, and Riordan (1997)