Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun;38(3):961–992. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00156

Table 4.

Sample Descriptive Statistics (N=38,185 observations, 21,965 persons) Statistics Listed Are: 1993 Average/1996 Average/Average over All Observations

HMO Member Yes: 5%/ 22%/ 12% Health Status:
 Self-perceived: Excellent/very good: 42%/ 44%/ 42%
Sociodemographics: Good/fair: 50%/ 49%/ 50%
 Age 65–74: 40%/ 43%/ 40% Poor: 8%/ 7%/ 8%
75–84: 40%/ 40%/ 40%
85+: 20%/ 17%/ 20%  ADLs: Mean: 4.89 / 5.09 / 4.95 (s.d. 1.81 / 1.65 / 1.77)
 Sex: Male: 39%/ 41%/ 40%  IADLs: Mean: 4.57 / 4.85 / 4.66 (s.d. 2.03 / 1.85 / 1.98)
 Race: White: 88%/ 88%/ 88%  Health limits social life: Yes: 38%/ 32%/ 36%
Black: 9%/ 9%/ 9%  Number of health Mean: 2.98 / 2.82 / 3.00 (s.d. 2.06 / 2.00 / 2.07)
Other: 3%/ 3%/ 3%  conditions (of 17):
 Nursing home: Yes: 10%/ 7%/ 9%  Arthritis: Yes: 57%/ 54%/ 57%
 Education: <High school: 27%/ 23%/ 25%  Cancer: Yes 20%/ 18%/ 20%
High school: 45%/ 46%/ 46%  Stroke: Yes: 13%/ 13%/ 14%
Some college 25%/ 28%/ 26%  Other conditions (of 14): Mean: 2.16 / 2.02 / 2/16 (s.d. 1.75 / 1.68 / 1.75)
Market Characteristics:
Missing: 3%/ 3%/ 3%  IPA model HMO in county: Yes: 91%/ 98%/ 95%
 Income: <$10,000:$10,000–$30,000: 35%/ 25%/ 31%49%/ 49%/ 50%  Percent penetration: Mean: 4.99 / 13.80 / 9.00 (s.d. 9.55 / 14.74 / 12.80)
$30,001–$50,000: 11%/ 13%/ 12% Control variables:
>$50,000:Missing: 5%/ 5%/ 5%0%/ 6%/ 2%  AAPCC rate: Mean: −45.59 / 48.18 / 3.41 (s.d. 82.32 / 104.87 / 101.68)
 Medigap: Yes: 67%/ 63%/ 65%  Year of observation: 1993: N=7,810 (21%)
No: 31%/ 37%/ 34% 1994: N=8,528 (22%)
Missing: 2%/ 0%/ 1% 1995: N=8,474 (22%)
 Medicaid: Yes: 13%/ 11%/ 13% 1996: N=13,373 (35%)
 Usual source of care: Yes: 87%/ 88%/ 88%

The relatively high HMO membership and mean penetration in 1996 reflects the MCBS's 1996 oversample of HMO enrollees

Deviation from the mean