Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun;38(3):961–992. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00156

Table 5.

Regression Results Probit Estimation: Probability of HMO Membership

N=38,185 χ253=6097.67 (p=0.0000)
Coeffecient Robust S.E.
Constant −1.34** (0.201)
Market penetration:
 Percent penetration 3.47** (0.51)
 Penetration×Excellent healthL −0.19 (0.17)
 Penetration×Poor healthL 0.0052 (0.37)
 Penetration×ADLsL 0.12 (0.088)
 Penetration×IADLsL −0.0054 (0.087)
 Penetration×Social limitationsL −0.019 (0.19)
 Penetration×History of arthritisL 0.38* (0.17)
 Penetration×Number of other conditionsL −0.103 (0.056)
 IPA plan available 0.22 (0.15)
Health and functional status:
 Excellent healthL 0.099* (0.040)
 Poor healthL −0.085 (0.089)
 ADLsL 0.0033 (0.0201)
 IADLsL 0.0109 (0.020)
 Social limitationsL −0.051 (0.046)
 History of arthritisL −0.014 (0.0401)
 History of cancerL −0.11** (0.037)
 History of strokeL −0.12* (0.049)
 Number of other conditionsL −0.014 (0.014)
Demographics:
AAPCC adjusters:
 Ages 75 to 84 −0.094** (0.030)
 Age 85+ −0.17** (0.044)
 Male 0.017 (0.030)
 Medicaid recipient −1.21** (0.068)
 Nursing home resident −0.24** (0.092)
Other:
 Less than high school education −0.16** (0.038)
 Some college −0.12** (0.034)
 Medigap policyL −1.39** (0.033)
 Black −0.00079 (0.0507)
 Other nonwhite race −0.036 (0.086)
 Married 0.0808** (0.0307)
 Has a usual source of care 0.50** (0.058)
 Income<$10,000 −0.0012 (0.035)
 Income $30,001–$50,000 −0.13** (0.0403)
 Income>$50,000 −0.29** (0.065)
County variables:
 AAPCC rate (deviation from mean) 0.00097** (0.00022)
*

p≤0.05,

**

p≤0.01;

L

Lagged by one year;

Included in model but not reported in table: census region, rural/urban residence code, year, and missing data indicators for income, education, and Medigap.