Table 1.
Correlations of CAHPS® Adult Survey Items with Reporting Composite and Global Ratings
Global Ratings of | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adult Survey Composites and Items | CAHPS® Reporting Composite† | Personal Doctor‡ | Specialist‡ | All Health Care‡ | Health Plan‡ |
Getting Care Quickly | 1.0 | .40 | .28 | .57 | .48 |
AC15 how often got help when calling doctor | .42 | .34 | .22 | .46 | .38 |
AC17 how often got appointment for regular care | .40 | .27 | .19 | .38 | .32 |
AC19 how often got care for illness or injury | .36 | .27 | .20 | .40 | .36 |
AC24 how often waited <15 minutes | .27 | .19 | .13 | .28 | .22 |
Doctors Who Communicate Well | 1.0 | .46 | .30 | .66 | .44 |
AC27 how often doctors listened carefully | .73 | .41 | .26 | .58 | .38 |
AC28 how often doctors explained things | .68 | .35 | .24 | .51 | .33 |
AC29 how often doctors showed respect | .75 | .40 | .26 | .57 | .38 |
AC30 how often doctors spent enough time | .69 | .39 | .26 | .56 | .38 |
Courteous/Helpful Office Staff | 1.0 | .34 | .23 | .52 | .38 |
AC25 how often office staff courteous/respectful | .61 | .28 | .19 | .43 | .31 |
AC26 how often office staff was helpful | .61 | .33 | .23 | .50 | .37 |
Getting Needed Care | 1.0 | .35 | .26 | .54 | .57 |
AC06 no problem getting personal doctor or nurse | .32 | .29 | .19 | .39 | .41 |
AC10 no problem getting referral to specialists | .40 | .24 | .18 | .36 | .38 |
AC22 no problem getting care thought necessary | .48 | .27 | .20 | .44 | .38 |
AC23 no problem with delays for plan approval | .43 | .17 | .14 | .31 | .41 |
Health Plan Customer Service | 1.0 | .28 | .24 | .43 | .62 |
AC33 no problem in finding or understanding written plan information | .30 | .20 | .16 | .30 | .40 |
AC35 no problem getting help from customer service | .35 | .20 | .18 | .32 | .48 |
AC37 no problem with paperwork for plan | .32 | .20 | .17 | .31 | .44 |
Source: Responses (166,074) to CAHPS® surveys among 306 plans in the 1999 National CAHPS® Benchmarking Database. All question numbers refer to the CAHPS® 2.0 Adult Survey.
Item to composite correlations were corrected for item overlap with the composite score.
Each rating ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worse possible and 10 is the best possible.
All correlation coefficients were significantly different from zero, p<.0001.