Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;39(1):131–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00219.x

Table 5.

Effects of HMO Penetration and Competition on Costs and Outcomes

Costs Outcomes


ln(admission) ln(30day) ln(l year) 30-Day Mortality 1-Year Mortality
HMO penetration – medium −0.007 0.001 −0.011 1.063 1.027
[0.28] [0.05] [0.39] [1.33] [0.68]
HMO penetration – high −0.035 −0.024 −0.054 1.022 1.007
[1.26] [0.89] [1.81] [0.45] [0.17]
HMO competition – medium 0.027 0.029 0.013 1.06 1.043
[1.25] [1.38] [0.60] [1.54] [1.41]
HMO competition – high 0.111** 0.119** 0.082* 0.994 1.01
[3.02] [3.32] [2.46] [0.12] [0.25]
Hospital competition – medium 0.066 0.057 0.057 1.062 1.02
[1.92] [1.73] [1.56] [1.30] [0.45]
Hospital competition – high −0.013 −0.019 0.028 1.024 0.983
[0.24] [0.37] [0.54] [0.34] [0.29]
Government 0.021 0.025 0.032 1.085 1.079*
[0.99] [1.21] [1.60] [1.91] [2.50]
For-Profit 0.032 0.034 0.052* 0.969 1.008
[1.65] [1.79] [2.58] [0.86] [0.26]
Teaching 0.096** 0.095** 0.102** 0.927* 0.96
[4.84] [4.93] [5.01] [2.55] [1.64]
Bed Size 151–300 0.056** 0.049** 0.055** 0.882** 0.937*
[3.29] [2.90] [2.86] [3.63] [2.18]
Bed Size 301–500 0.089** 0.075** 0.083** 0.820** 0.894**
[4.20] [3.60] [3.46] [5.31] [3.49]
Bed Size >500 0.180** 0.156** 0.156** 0.770** 0.835**
[7.65] [6.69] [6.10] [6.21] [5.08]
Observations 93,386 93,385 56,340 93,386 93,386
Adjusted/Pseudo R2 0.140 0.140 0.130 0.320 0.266

Robust t/z-statistics in brackets.

*

significant at 5%;

**

significant at 1%.

Cost models estimated using OLS and coefficients shown.

Outcome models estimated using maximum likelihood logit and odds ratios shown.