Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 8;87(9):878–884. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001131

Table 2.

Comparison of stenosis lesions, stent characteristics, technical success rates, periprocedural complications, and short-term outcomes between the Wingspan stent group and the Credo stent group

Wingspan stent group (n = 17) Credo stent group (n = 12) p
Stenosis lesion
 Target vessel, n (%) 0.274
  MCA 6 (35.3%) 7 (58.3%)
  Intracranial ICA 11 (64.7%) 5 (41.7%)
 Lesion side, n (%) 0.716
  Left 7 (41.2%) 6 (50.0%)
  Right 10 (58.9%) 6 (50.0%)
Stenosis (mean ± SD) 82.6% ± 9.6% (70.0%-99.0%) 81.3% ± 8.3% (70.0%-90.0%) 0.735
Stent characteristics
 Stent diameter, mm (mean ± SD) 3.74 ± 0.66 (2.50-4.50) 3.71 ± 0.84 (3.00-5.50) 0.713
 Stent length, mm (mean ± SD) 19.41 ± 1.66 (15-20) 20.83 ± 2.89 (20-30) 0.102
Technical success, n (%) 16 (94.1%) 11 (91.7%) 1.000
Safety
 Periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage, n (%) 2 (11.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0.498
 Silent embolic ischemic lesion of ipsilateral MCA territory on DWI, n (%) 0.422
  No 4 (23.5%) 5 (41.7%)
  Yes 13 (76.5%) 7 (58.3%)
 Ischemic stroke or death within 30 d after stenting 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Outcomes
 Significant in-stent restenosis (>50%) within 1 y 4 (23.5%) 2 (16.7%) 1.000
 Recurrent stroke within 1 y 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)

The results are shown as the number (%) or mean ± SD (range).

MCA = middle cerebral artery.

DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging