Skip to main content
. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1691–1712. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00313.x

Table 5.

Effects of HAART in the Base Case and with Specification Checks

Employment Outcomes

Return to Work Remain Employed Hours of Work



Specification w/o HAART w/HAART w/o HAART w/HAART w/o HAART w/HAART
Base case 0.16 0.14 0.57 0.94 29.7 48.2
(0.13) (0.19) (0.06) (0.01) (6.6) (8.9)
Specification checks
Add insurance 0.15 0.14 0.58 0.94 31.7 45.8
(0.10) (0.19) (0.07) (0.01) (6.1) (8.2)
Employer-sponsored insurance only* N/A 0.45 0.95 32.8 50.2
(0.03) (0.01) (6.5) (6.3)
No participation in welfare programs* 0.22 0.77 N/A N/A
(0.03) (0.03)

Notes: Results show the mean predicted values for the three employment outcomes with and without HAART. Sample sizes in the base case are 1,303 for return to work, 800 for remain employed, and 870 for hours of work. For the specification checks, the sample was restricted to the subpopulations as noted. Employer-sponsored insurance and participation in welfare programs are based on reports at either baseline or first follow-up. For employer-sponsored insurance, sample sizes are 409 (remain employed) and 393 hours of work. Information on coverage in previous jobs is unknown so the return to work case cannot be estimated. The sample size for nonparticipants in welfare programs in the scenario of return to work is 210.