Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug;40(4):1197–1216. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00400.x

Table 4.

The Association between Hospice Concentration and the Occurrence of Disagreement in Pain Rating on Nonhospice Residents between NH and Study Nurses: Mild Daily or Worse Pain versus No Pain or Mild Less than Daily Pain (Cutoff=1)

False Positive (FP) False Negative (FN)
Null models with random intercepts
 Unexplained variance at facility level
  Variance 0.60 (0.13)* 0.47 (0.12)
  Covariance −0.09 (0.09)
 Intraclass correlation 0.10 0.06
Full models with random intercepts
 Hospice concentration (%)
  0−3
  3−5 0.62 (0.37–1.04) 0.72 (0.44–1.20)
  5+ 0.60 (0.37–0.97) 0.82 (0.54–1.27)
 Age (centered)
  Linear term 1.05 (0.88–1.25) 1.30 (1.10–1.54)
  Quadratic term 0.96 (0.88–1.05) 1.05 (0.96–1.14)
 Cognitive impairment
  No or mild (CPS=0 or 1)
  Moderate (CPS=2 or 3) 0.64 (0.47–0.86) 0.81 (0.59–1.12)
  Severe (CPS=4, 5, or 6) 0.46 (0.30–0.69) 1.04 (0.71–1.51)
 Having cancer 0.99 (0.66–1.49) 1.24 (0.82–1.88)
 Having dementia 1.14 (0.80–1.61) 0.94 (0.68–1.32)
 Male 0.87 (0.66–1.14) 1.06 (0.80–1.40)
 Nurse hours/resident 0.89 (0.74–1.08) 0.95 (0.80–1.14)
 Occupancy rate <80% 1.57 (1.08–2.30) 0.94 (0.64–1.38)
 Part of a chain 0.77 (0.56–1.06) 1.09 (0.80–1.49)
 Having 100+beds 1.13 (0.76–1.67) 1.01 (0.69–1.46)
 Number of health deficiencies >50th percentile in the state 1.06 (0.74–1.51) 1.02 (0.73–1.44)
 Location of the study nursing home
  California 1.71 (0.95–3.09) 0.73 (0.39–1.35)
  Illinois 1.11 (0.61–2.02) 1.76 (1.04–2.97)
  Missouri 1.48 (0.71–3.07) 3.05 (1.66–5.60)
  Ohio 2.72 (1.52–4.87) 0.95 (0.51–1.75)
  Pennsylvania 1.40 (0.80–2.46) 1.12 (0.67–1.88)
  Tennessee
 Unexplained variance at facility level
  Variance 0.36 (0.11) 0.25 (0.10)
  Covariance 0.01 (0.08)
*

Standard error of variance at the level of nursing home.

Referent group.