Table 6.
Percent of Population Residing in a Potential HPSA*
Rural–Urban Continuum Code | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Travel Assumptions | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Consumers can only access PCPs in own county | 0.3 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.3 | 3.8 | 44.6 | 29.8 |
Consumers choose closest PCP | 21.7 | 52.8 | 30.9 | 28.2 | 29.3 | 16.2 | 28.3 | 13.2 | 52.0 | 29.7 |
Probability declines exponentially with distance: average distance=5 miles | 0.0 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 8.7 | 5.5 | 30.0 | 19.0 |
Probability declines exponentially with distance: average distance=10 miles | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 11.1 | 7.3 |
A potential HPSA is defined here as an average primary care caseload greater than 3,500 patients.
Source: Authors' calculations using data from the AMA Masterfile and U.S. Census data. See note to Table 2 for states included.
AMA, American Medical Association; HPSA, health professional shortage area; PCP, primary care physician.