Table 2.
Bates-Jensen wound assessment scores in the two groups at different time points [points, M (P25, P75)].
| Group | Initial visit | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Time factor F/P | Group factor F/P | Time × Group F/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (n = 34) | 30.00 (25.75, 31.00) | 24.50 (22.00, 29.00) | 19.00 (14.00, 25.00) | 13.50 (6.00, 20.00) | 77.304/<0.001 | 11.492/0.001 | 4.075/0.010 |
| Control group (n = 34) | 31.00 (27.00, 33.00) | 27.50 (24.75, 31.00) | 23.00 (20.75, 28.00) | 21.00 (17.00, 24.00) | |||
| Mann–Whitney U | 432.000 | 397.000 | 380.000 | 293.500 | |||
| Z value | −1.797 | −2.227 | −2.432 | −3.521 | |||
| p-value | 0.072 | 0.026 | 0.015 | <0.001 |
Data are presented as median (P25, P75), as the Week-4 Bates-Jensen scores departed from normality (Shapiro–Wilk p < 0.05 in both groups). The two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was retained as the primary analysis given its robustness to moderate departures from normality with equal group sizes (n = 34 per group); the main effects of time, group, and the time × group interaction are shown in the last three columns. Mann–Whitney U tests at each time point were performed as non-parametric sensitivity analyses (Bonferroni-adjusted significance level α = 0.0125). M (P25, P75) = median (25th percentile, 75th percentile).