Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 11;14:1837193. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1837193

Table 2.

Bates-Jensen wound assessment scores in the two groups at different time points [points, M (P25, P75)].

Group Initial visit Week 1 Week 2 Week 4 Time factor F/P Group factor F/P Time × Group F/P
Intervention group (n = 34) 30.00 (25.75, 31.00) 24.50 (22.00, 29.00) 19.00 (14.00, 25.00) 13.50 (6.00, 20.00) 77.304/<0.001 11.492/0.001 4.075/0.010
Control group (n = 34) 31.00 (27.00, 33.00) 27.50 (24.75, 31.00) 23.00 (20.75, 28.00) 21.00 (17.00, 24.00)
Mann–Whitney U 432.000 397.000 380.000 293.500
Z value −1.797 −2.227 −2.432 −3.521
p-value 0.072 0.026 0.015 <0.001

Data are presented as median (P25, P75), as the Week-4 Bates-Jensen scores departed from normality (Shapiro–Wilk p < 0.05 in both groups). The two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was retained as the primary analysis given its robustness to moderate departures from normality with equal group sizes (n = 34 per group); the main effects of time, group, and the time × group interaction are shown in the last three columns. Mann–Whitney U tests at each time point were performed as non-parametric sensitivity analyses (Bonferroni-adjusted significance level α = 0.0125). M (P25, P75) = median (25th percentile, 75th percentile).