Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 11;17:1883842. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1883842

Table 2.

Group differences in visual hierarchical functional connectivity.

Measure HC mean ± SD IGD mean ± SD Statistic p FDR-corrected p Effect size
V1–Lingual 0.786 ± 0.237 0.689 ± 0.352 F(1,59) = 4.046 0.049 0.073 partial η2 = 0.064; d = 0.32
Lingual–LOC 0.353 ± 0.172 0.265 ± 0.252 F(1,59) = 2.857 0.096 0.096 partial η2 = 0.046; d = 0.40
V1–LOC 0.364 ± 0.132 0.130 ± 0.189 F(1,59) = 30.809 <0.001 <0.001 partial η2 = 0.343; d = 1.42
HII −0.422 ± 0.248 −0.559 ± 0.332 t = 1.90 0.062 — d = 0.46

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Group differences in the three primary ROI-based functional connectivity measures were assessed using MANCOVA, with age, sex, years of education, and mean framewise displacement as covariates. Following the significant multivariate group effect, univariate analyses were performed for V1–Lingual, Lingual–LOC, and V1–LOC connectivity. P values for these three follow-up tests were corrected using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate procedure. Partial η2 represents the effect size from the covariate-adjusted univariate analyses, whereas Cohen’s d was calculated using the pooled standard deviation. HII was analyzed separately as a secondary derived measure because it was mathematically derived from V1–LOC and V1–Lingual connectivity and was not included in the MANCOVA.