Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 25. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1039/d6ra07636j

Table 2. Antioxidant activity of M. × giganteus extracts. Data are expressed as a means with standard deviation in milligram of equivalent per gram of dry extract.

FRAP(mg AAE g−1) CUPRAC(mg AAE g−1) TAC (mg TE g−1) DPPH(EC50 mg mL−1) TPC(mg GAE g−1) TFC (mg QE g−1)
Root MeOH 50.3 ± 3.5 29.4 ± 0.5 594.9 ± 1.6 0.6 ± 0.10 87.0 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.2
Root DCM 9.5 ± 0.4 51.2 ± 0.5 115.4 ± 5.5 12.4 ± 1.50 13.2 ± 1.4 9.0 ± 0.5
Rhizome MeOH 25.5 ± 5.5 32.6 ± 2.5 377.7 ± 0.8 1.7 ± 0.10 32.8 ± 4.2 0.5 ± 0.1
Rhizome DCM 11.2 ± 0.1 29.7 ± 0.1 171.9 ± 0.6 6.4 ± 0.30 18.4 ± 3.4 5.4 ± 0.1
Stem MeOH 21.8 ± 5.9 22.1 ± 2.9 300.1 ± 22.3 2.5 ± 0.20 34.9 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.2
Stem DCM 5.7 ± 0.6 40.8 ± 5.6 109.7 ± 3.6 11.5 ± 0.60 9.7 ± 2.1 2.9 ± 0.1
Leaf MeOH 34.7 ± 2.9 45.8 ± 0.9 395.3 ± 5.3 0.9 ± 0.10 39.0 ± 0.4 6.9 ± 0.4
Leaf DCM 5.0 ± 0.1 18.9 ± 0.7 310.4 ± 3.1 >20.0a 10.3 ± 2.1 20.6 ± 0.2
a

Even at 20 mg mL−1 of extract only 17% of DPPH was inhibited.