Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 11;14:1915745. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1915745

Table 2.

Systematic reviews of epidemiological evidence on RF-EMF exposure and childhood cancer risk.

Author (year) Type of study Population type RF-EMF source type Distance from the source Exposure assessment Type of cancer Results
Röösli et al. (2019) (120) Systematic Review Children (include prenatal exposure) Mobile phone NR (varied across included studies) Self-reported mobile phone use, operator records, and environmental RF-EMF estimates Brain tumors No consistent evidence of an association between RF-EMF exposure and childhood brain tumours.
Bodewein et al. (2022) (135) Systematic review Children and adolescents Mobile phone NR (varied across included studies) Predominantly questionnaires and interviews; some studies used exposure modelling Brain tumours and childhood cancers Evidence was insufficient to establish an association between RF-EMF exposure and childhood cancer because of the limited number and methodological quality of available studies.
Karipidis et al. (2025) (136) WHO systematic review of observational studies General population (including children) Mobile phones and base stations Near and far-field Self-reported mobile phone use, environmental exposure modelling, and study-specific exposure assessment Paediatric brain tumors and leukemia Moderate-certainty evidence indicated no increased risk of childhood cancer associated with RF-EMF exposure.

NR, Not reported.