Table 2.
Systematic reviews of epidemiological evidence on RF-EMF exposure and childhood cancer risk.
| Author (year) | Type of study | Population type | RF-EMF source type | Distance from the source | Exposure assessment | Type of cancer | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Röösli et al. (2019) (120) | Systematic Review | Children (include prenatal exposure) | Mobile phone | NR (varied across included studies) | Self-reported mobile phone use, operator records, and environmental RF-EMF estimates | Brain tumors | No consistent evidence of an association between RF-EMF exposure and childhood brain tumours. |
| Bodewein et al. (2022) (135) | Systematic review | Children and adolescents | Mobile phone | NR (varied across included studies) | Predominantly questionnaires and interviews; some studies used exposure modelling | Brain tumours and childhood cancers | Evidence was insufficient to establish an association between RF-EMF exposure and childhood cancer because of the limited number and methodological quality of available studies. |
| Karipidis et al. (2025) (136) | WHO systematic review of observational studies | General population (including children) | Mobile phones and base stations | Near and far-field | Self-reported mobile phone use, environmental exposure modelling, and study-specific exposure assessment | Paediatric brain tumors and leukemia | Moderate-certainty evidence indicated no increased risk of childhood cancer associated with RF-EMF exposure. |
NR, Not reported.