Skip to main content
. 2026 Sep 11;28:e100505. doi: 10.2196/100505

Table 5.

EQ-5D health utility scores.

Study and time point ePROMa Control Between-group difference (P value)

EQ-5D score Change from baseline EQ-5D score Change from baseline
eRAPID [33] health utility (mapped to EQ-5D-3L), mean (SD; n) N/Ab

Baseline 0.758 (0.185; 250) N/A 0.753 (0.18; 248) N/A

6 weeks 0.776 (0.175; 213) –0.001 (0.183; 209) 0.752 (0.197); 226) 0 (0.176; 224)

12 weeks 0.747 (0.192; 202) –0.028 (0.191; 196) 0.734 (0.18; 210) –0.025 (0.178; 208)

18 weeks 0.739 (0.216; 189) –0.052 (0.209; 184) 0.708 (0.213; 202) –0.05 (0.212; 200)
STAR [38] health utility (rescaled from 0-100 to 0-1), mean (95% CI)

Baseline (all), mean (95% CI) 0.862 (0.847 to 0.877) N/A 0.866 (0.847 to 0.885) N/A N/A

6 months, mean (95% CI) 0.848 (0.832 to 0.864) 0.014 (–0.004 to 0.031) 0.795 (0.767 to 0.822) 0.071 (0.048 to 0.095) N/A

Point drop difference (ePROM—control), mean (95% CI) N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.057 (<.001)

Computer inexperienced N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.065 (.01)

Computer experienced N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.057 (<.001)

aePROM: electronic patient-reported outcome measure.

bN/A: not applicable.