Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 6;34(3):917–927. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj487

Table 1.

Representative results of predicted motif pairs

Input TF pair Known binding motifs Predicted top motif pair Known TF–TF interaction −log(p)
Mbp1:Swi4 ACGCGTnA:TTTTCGCG ACGCG:CGCGa 1 25.6
Fkh1:Fkh2 TTGTTTACST:TTGTTTACST TTGTTTA:TGTTTA 1 17.0
Msn4:Swi5 CCCCT:KGCTGR CCCTg:caGCcGc 16.7
Fkh2:Swi6 TTGTTTACST:ACGCGT TGTTTAC:ACGCG 16.2
Fkh2:Mbp1 TTGTTTACST:ACGCGTnA TTGTTTA:gACGCG 16.1
Ste12:Swi6 RTGAAACA:ACGCGT cAcGAAA:ACGCG 14.2
Pdr1:Rap1 CCGCGG:ACACCCATACATTT GCGG:ACCCA 14.0
Cup9:Yap6 N.A.:N.A. GGCAC:TGCAGG 13.7
Rlm1:Swi6 CTAWWWWTAG:ACGCGT AAACTA:aACGCG 13.6
Fkh1:Swi6 TTGTTTACST:ACGCGT TTGTTTA:ACGCG 13.5
Mcm1:Swi6 TTWCCCnWWWRGGAAA:ACGCGT ATCGGGA:ACGCG 12.9
Fkh2:Mcm1 TTGTTTACST:TTWCCCnWWWRGGAAA TGTTTAC:TAGGA 1 11.3
Ace2:Fkh1 GCTGGT:TTGTTTACST GCTGGTt:TcTTTAg 11.2
Ino2:Ino4 CATGTGAAAT:CATGTGAAAT CATGTGA:caCATGC 1 10.4
Msn4:Rap1 CCCCT:ACACCCATACATTT CACCCA:CCCCCA 9.4
Mcm1:Ste12 TTWCCCnWWWRGGAAA:RTGAAACA GGAAAtt:TGAAACA 1 9.2