Table 1.
A comparison of four of the most common DNA microarray formats
Contact printing | Inkjet synthesis | Affymetrix | NimbleGen | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arraying method | Mechanical deposition | Phosphoramitide synthesis, piezoelectric printing | In situ DNA synthesis (photolithography) | In situ DNA synthesis (maskless photolithography) |
DNA size limit | None | ∼60 nt | 25 nt | ∼100 nt |
Feature type | PCR products, oligomers | Oligomers | Oligomers | Oligomers |
Features/slide | ≤40 K | ≤40 K | 60 K–6.2 M | 200–800 K |
Array design | Flexible | Flexible | Fixed | Flexible |
Fabrication cost | High (DNA preparation) | Moderate | High | Low |
Array cost | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
While contact-printed arrays allow for unlimited customization, the initial production cost can be prohibitive compared with the relatively affordable but fixed-array designs commercially available. Maskless photolithographic arrays represent a trade-off between these platforms, allowing customized design while maintaining very high feature density.