Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb;16(2):271–281. doi: 10.1101/gr.4452906

Table 1.

A comparison of four of the most common DNA microarray formats

Contact printing Inkjet synthesis Affymetrix NimbleGen
Arraying method Mechanical deposition Phosphoramitide synthesis, piezoelectric printing In situ DNA synthesis (photolithography) In situ DNA synthesis (maskless photolithography)
DNA size limit None ∼60 nt 25 nt ∼100 nt
Feature type PCR products, oligomers Oligomers Oligomers Oligomers
Features/slide ≤40 K ≤40 K 60 K–6.2 M 200–800 K
Array design Flexible Flexible Fixed Flexible
Fabrication cost High (DNA preparation) Moderate High Low
Array cost Low Moderate Moderate Moderate

While contact-printed arrays allow for unlimited customization, the initial production cost can be prohibitive compared with the relatively affordable but fixed-array designs commercially available. Maskless photolithographic arrays represent a trade-off between these platforms, allowing customized design while maintaining very high feature density.