Table 4.
Mechanistic modes of Arp2/3 and myosin coordination across systems.
| Mode | Representative system | Molecular basis | Evidence and interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct/modular activation | Budding-yeast endocytosis | Type-I myosin motor and actin-assembly activation activities are separable but locally coordinated (Hill et al., 2024b). | Genetic and cellular evidence; organism-specific and not established for mammalian myosin-I. |
| Recruitment control | Fission-yeast endocytosis | Ank1 restricts nonspecific Myo1 membrane binding and spatially limits endocytic activity (Willet et al., 2023). | Genetic and imaging evidence for regulatory coupling; not proof of a conserved mammalian activation mechanism. |
| Structural anchoring | Mammalian clathrin-mediated endocytosis | Myo1E couples cortical actin to membrane and responds to membrane tension (Smith et al., 2026). | Imaging and perturbation support load-dependent mechanical coordination, not direct Arp2/3 activation. |
| CARMIL-mediated bridging | Dictyostelium discoideum | CARMIL links type-I myosin, capping protein, and Arp2/3 through distinct interactions (Jung et al., 2001). | Scaffold-mediated molecular coupling supported by biochemical interaction data. |
| Mechanical/signaling coupling | Migrating cells and neuronal growth cones | Arp2/3-dependent protrusion and NMII-dependent contractility interact through actin flow, pressure, adhesion, and Rho signaling (Yang et al., 2012; Patel et al., 2021). | Spatially separated modules; cell perturbation supports mechanical cross-talk rather than stable binding. |
| Reconstituted mechanical synergy | Actin-comet system | myosin-I remodels Arp2/3-dependent branched networks and increases pushing efficiency (Xu et al., 2024). | Purified reconstitution provides strong evidence for context-dependent synergy in the tested system. |