Table 2.
A comparison of GNCM performance on the test set using different sequence tokenizing and word embedding methods
| Sequence tokenizing | Word Embedding | Algorithm | Accuracy | F1 | Precision | Recall | Cross-Entropy Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPE | CBOW | GNCM | 0.9960 | 0.9957 | 0.9947 | 0.9967 | 0.0126 |
| Sg | GNCM | 0.9922 | 0.9922 | 0.9921 | 0.9923 | 0.0328 | |
| CBOW | BiLSTM + SAM | 0.9647 | 0.9647 | 0.9646 | 0.9648 | 0.1054 | |
| Sg | BiLSTM + SAM | 0.8686 | 0.8682 | 0.8781 | 0.8708 | 0.3380 | |
| HFkmer | CBOW | GNCM | 0.9869 | 0.9869 | 0.9873 | 0.9865 | 0.0391 |
| Sg | GNCM | 0.8072 | 0.8012 | 0.8257 | 0.7998 | 0.4263 | |
| CBOW | BiLSTM + SAM | 0.9935 | 0.9934 | 0.9934 | 0.9934 | 0.0140 | |
| Sg | BiLSTM + SAM | 0.8170 | 0.8107 | 0.8400 | 0.8090 | 0.4078 |