Skip to main content
. 2026 Jul 6;27:786. doi: 10.1186/s12864-026-13128-5

Table 2.

A comparison of GNCM performance on the test set using different sequence tokenizing and word embedding methods

Sequence tokenizing Word Embedding Algorithm Accuracy F1 Precision Recall Cross-Entropy Loss
BPE CBOW GNCM 0.9960 0.9957 0.9947 0.9967 0.0126
Sg GNCM 0.9922 0.9922 0.9921 0.9923 0.0328
CBOW BiLSTM + SAM 0.9647 0.9647 0.9646 0.9648 0.1054
Sg BiLSTM + SAM 0.8686 0.8682 0.8781 0.8708 0.3380
HFkmer CBOW GNCM 0.9869 0.9869 0.9873 0.9865 0.0391
Sg GNCM 0.8072 0.8012 0.8257 0.7998 0.4263
CBOW BiLSTM + SAM 0.9935 0.9934 0.9934 0.9934 0.0140
Sg BiLSTM + SAM 0.8170 0.8107 0.8400 0.8090 0.4078